<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Milford, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Theobald, M.R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Nemitz, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hargreaves, K J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Horvath, L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Raso, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Dämmgen, U.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Neftel, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Jones, S. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hensen, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Loubet, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cellier, P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sutton, M. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2009</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Ammonia fluxes in relation to cutting and fertilization of an intensively managed grassland derived from an inter-comparison of gradient measurements</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Biogeosciences</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>6</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>819-834</PAGES>
	<ABSTRACT>&lt;p&gt;Quantification of ammonia (NH3) land-atmosphere exchange is required for atmospheric modelling and assessment of nitrogen deposition, yet flux measurement methods remain highly uncertain. To address this issue, a major inter-comparison of ammonia fluxes over intensively managed grassland was conducted during the GRAMINAE Integrated Experiment held in Braunschweig, Germany. In order to provide a robust dataset of ammonia exchange with the vegetation, four independent continuous flux gradient systems were operated. Three independently operated continuous wet denuders systems (AMANDA) were compared with a Wet Effluent Diffusion Denuder (mini-WEDD) system. Measurements were made at two distances from an adjacent livestock farm, allowing effects of advection to be quantified in a real landscape setting. Data treatment included filtering for instrument failure, disturbed wind sectors and unsuitable micrometeorological conditions, with corrections made for storage and advection errors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The inter-comparison demonstrated good agreement in measured ammonia concentrations and fluxes (relative standard error &amp;lt;20%) for some periods, although the performance of the ammonia analyzers were variable, with much poorer agreement on particular days. However, by using four systems, the inter-comparison was able to provide a robust mean estimate of continuous ammonia fluxes through the experiment. The observed fluxes were: a) small bi-directional fluxes prior to cutting (-64 to 42 ng NH3 m-2 s-1), b) larger diurnally-varying emissions following cutting (-49 to 703 ng NH3 m-2 s-1) and c) much larger emissions following fertilizer application (0 to 3820 ng NH3 m-2 s-1). The results are a salutary reminder of the uncertainty in unreplicated ammonia flux measurements, while the replication of the present study provides a uniquely robust dataset for the evaluation of ammonia exchange processes. It is clear that consistently reliable determination of ammonia concentrations remains the major measurement challenge.&lt;/p&gt;</ABSTRACT>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>
