<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>de Vries, W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Solberg, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Dobbertin, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sterba, H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Laubhahn, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Reinds, G.J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Nabuurs, G.-J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gundersen, P</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sutton, M.A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2008</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Ecologically implausible carbon response?</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Nature </SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>451</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>E1-E3</PAGES>
	<ABSTRACT>&lt;p style=&quot;margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-indent: 36pt; text-align: justify;&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;&quot; lang=&quot;EN-GB&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman;&quot;&gt;Magnani et al.&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; present a very strong correlation between mean lifetime net ecosystem production (NEP, defined as the net rate of C accumulation in ecosystems&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) and wet N deposition. For their data in the range 4.9-9.8 kgN/ha/yr, on which the correlation largely depends, the response is approximately &lt;st1:metricconverter productid=&quot;725 kg&quot; w:st=&quot;on&quot;&gt;725 kg&lt;/st1:metricconverter&gt; C per kg N in wet deposition. According to the authors, the maximum N wet deposition level of &lt;st1:metricconverter productid=&quot;9.8 kg&quot; w:st=&quot;on&quot;&gt;9.8 kg&lt;/st1:metricconverter&gt; N/ha/yr is equivalent to a total deposition of &lt;st1:metricconverter productid=&quot;15 kg&quot; w:st=&quot;on&quot;&gt;15 kg&lt;/st1:metricconverter&gt; N/ha/yr, implying a net sequestration near 470 kgC per kg N of total deposition. We question the ecological plausibility of the relationship and show, from a multi-factor analysis of European forest measurements, how interactions with site productivity and environment imply a much smaller NEP response to N deposition. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</ABSTRACT>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>
